Holy Spirit Interactive
Thursday, March 23, 2017
Inside Holy Spirit Interactive

Straight Answers
Holy Spirit Interactive: Fr. William P. Saunders: The Pressure to Contracept (Part 6 in a series)

The Pressure to Contracept (Part 6 in a series)

by Fr. William P. Saunders

This week, Father Saunders concludes his discussion of marital love, contraception and Church teaching.

The Church faced increasing pressure regarding the use of contraceptive means with the marketing of the anovulant pill. In response, Vatican Council II stated in "Gaudium et Spes," "In questions of birth regulation, the sons and daughters of the Church, faithful to these principles, are forbidden to use methods disapproved of by the teaching authority of the Church in its interpretation of the divine law" (No. 51). However, Pope Paul VI had transferred the investigation of new questions concerning this matter to a special commission (originally established by Pope John XXIII in March, 1963) for the study of population, the family and births. The Holy Father would then review their findings and render judgment. The commission included married couples and those of various competencies in this field. Select bishops were also asked for their views; other bishops voluntarily submitted them.

On July 25, 1968, Pope Paul VI issued "Humanae Vitae," which upheld the consistent teaching of the Church based on natural law as well as divine revelation: "Each and every marriage act must remain open to the transmission of life" (No. 11).

Our Holy Father has continually repeated the Church's teaching. In "Familiaris Consortio," he lamented the signs of a "disturbing degradation of some fundamental values" evident in "the growing number of divorces, the scourge of abortion, the ever more frequent recourse to sterilization, the appearance of a truly contraceptive mentality" (No. 6).

Interestingly, Pope Paul VI prophesied grave consequences from contraception: increased marital infidelity and a lowering of moral standards; increased lack of respect for women, including seeing a woman as a sex object and as an instrument to satisfy sexual pleasures rather than seeing her as a partner in marriage; and the danger of empowering public authorities to regulate the lives of others. Thirty years later, these warnings have become realities: Statistics show the rapid increase of divorce, from a rate of 25 percent in 1965 to 50 percent in 1975 during the first five years of marriage. As of the year 2000, 50 percent of American teenagers have lived a significant part of their lives without a father figure. Moreover, Dr. Robert Michaels of Stanford University found a direct, positive correlation between the growing rate of divorce and the rate of contraception. (Interestingly, couples who use Natural Family Planning have a much lower divorce rate: 0.6 percent according to the Couple to Couple League, and 2-5 percent according to research conducted by California State University.)

Any person can attest to the deterioration of the moral quality of television and movies during this time. Pornography has become increasingly prevalent, with 630 million pornographic video rentals reported each year in the United States. The availability of pornography and sexual contacts through the Internet is alarming.

Crimes of rape continue to rise each year. The news is replete with cases alleging sexual harassment. Recently, we have been appalled by several cases where unmarried teenage parents killed their newborn child.

Finally, the intrusion of government into family planning has become more prevalent. Some municipal or state governments, such as Maryland and Kansas, have attempted to begin programs which pay women to use Norplant (the five-year contraceptive implanted in a woman's arm) to control the pregnancies of teenagers and welfare recipients; foreign countries like Peru have introduced sterilization programs and have compelled poor citizens to be sterilized. International policy set by the affluent Western nations to help developing Third World countries oftentimes includes mandatory population control provisions, including artificial birth control and abortion. Little wonder, Pope John Paul II declared Pope Paul VI's "Humanae Vitae" a "truly prophetic proclamation" ("Familiaris Consortio," No. 29).

Interestingly, Dr. William May in 1968 signed a statement with numerous other theologians dissenting from "Humane Vitae." He has long since recanted. In 1988, on the 20th anniversary of the encyclical, he said, "I was beginning to see that if contraception is justifiable, then perhaps artificial insemination, test-tube reproduction, and similar modes of generating life outside the marital embrace are morally justifiable too.... I began to realize that the moral theology invented to justify contraception could be used to justify any kind of deed. I saw that it was a consequentialist, utilitarian kind of argument, that it was a theory which repudiated the notion of intrinsically evil acts. I began to realize how truly prophetic the pope had been, and how providential it was that he had been given the strength to resist the tremendous pressures brought to bear upon him" (Columbia). Now 12 years later, articles concerning in vitro fertilization, surrogate motherhood and cloning appear regularly in the news media. One has to ask, "Where are we headed as a society?"

Pope Paul VI concluded "Humanae Vitae" with the statement that the Church is to be "a sign of contradiction." So indeed she is in upholding the sanctity of marriage and the error of contraception. Yes, the Church is going against the popular culture of the age. Nevertheless, St. Paul's words originally addressed to the Romans should resound in our own ears: "Do not conform yourselves to this age but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, so that you may judge what is God's will, what is good, pleasing and perfect" (Rom 12:2).


E-mail this article to a friend